TOMÁŠ ABSOLON / MONET ON MY MIND

Even today, we still tend to understand a picture as an autonomous entity, a unique, final object which has a life of its own and naturally separates itself from the whole of the world. For that matter, we have spent a long time pursuing this, so it’s all good! However, there exists a close link between picture and word, including the inner ones. They belong to each other by their very nature, yet we seldom stress that the connection should be direct and, especially, generally accessible so that everybody can go through the same gateway. Then, however, there come moments when a picture communicates nothing but solidarity, shared being and one existence when the picture itself not only moves between horizons and transcends them but it is also absorbed by reality. This fully applies to Petr Veselý’s pictures. Their objectivity involves not only the time dimension but also a transcendental one.

Ernst Gombrich writes in his reflection on illusion that the power of interpretation can’t be overestimated, mentioning J. M. W. Turner whom he views as somebody who deliberately and in favour of what he sees suppresses all he knows about the world.[1] Both are also relevant today, as we are moving on the same border of discernibility. Petr, however, turns not to what he can see but to what he can touch.

The moment of touch is magical, a touch has the power to take life and also to restore it. The laying of hands is an ancient ritual, hands radiate warmth and coolness, recognise, and in some cases also heal. The essence is always the same: the expression of craving for the original, the real, for what is genuine and to what we, at least imaginarily, return. Gombrich does that himself when talking about abstracted forms as a phenomenon of western visual culture which is certainly remarkable yet fatefully lacking any assessment rules. In Petr’s case, however, we move on the opposite side of the spectrum; a picture is an abstract, grey form, yet it is permanently striving at figuration, or evolves from it. At the sane time, what is abandoned calls for attention which is equally reversible, and the movement we perform during its recognition is thus cyclic and without memory. Echoes of objectivity are secondary, yet they have rules – and these manifest themselves in this way.

Petr’s work is about constants which regularly come to the fore. This regards both his poetry and what can be termed the natural life of things. As in a truly home environment things do not just appear but exist, they meander in forms and functions and their being has an order which also involves decline, so they are like this in the artist’s pictures, or rather, his pictures are like that. They show what a close link there is between them and the world if we deliberately insert them in the framework of our existence. Matter captivates.

Petr is aware of this, of course, otherwise he wouldn’t put so much effort into the bridging of the gap between reality and its image, between what has come to pass and what we expect. He also likes to enter this space, shaping it and summarizing it. Medieval altars in museums are the relics of other autonomous worlds, and the objects of the ordinary world devoid of their function are also like that. Naturally, this is an expression of reduction, but also concentration and (controlled) absence which, paradoxically, grows stable in its loss and thus resonates all the more its original function and talent.[2] A hand frozen in motion, a shirt stretched in its bend moving from the field to the picture and beyond expresses this perfectly. As Ivan Blecha writes, “a reflection that the restricted position of the observer (…) leads to a restricted presentation of a thing is wrong and the statement about the necessary non-representationality of some aspects of reality, about its permanent distortion, is in fact unreasoned extrapolation.“[3] A picture is often the only thing left of something that once existed. It is a notch of a knife in a cupboard.

^{^[1]}E. H. Gombrich. Umění a iluze. Studie o psychologii obrazového znázorňování. Praha 2019, p. 235.

^{^[2]} In the last decades the formative task and nature of “things” has also been resumed by the western philosophical tradition, namely by Bruno Latour and object-oriented ontology (OOO).

^{^[3]}Ivan Blecha. Prostory zjevnosti. Dílo ve struktuře světa. Zlín 2018, p. 129.

TOMÁŠ ABSOLON / MONET ON MY MIND

10.12.2014 - 16.01.2015

Fait Gallery Preview
Dominican Square 10, Brno
10/12/2014 – 16/1/2015
Opening: 9/12/2014 at 6pm
Curator: Martin Nytra

The main point of interest for Tomáš Absolon is a painting, which, in his concept, can be understood as an interface between depiction and abstraction. However, rather than this subtle line, the author devotes much more attention to work with visual shortcuts and means of painting, including the expression and gesture.

Absolon focuses on the relationship of the painting and reality, which the painting reproduces and also co-creates, and therefore Absolon understands it as a communication tool that uses its own language, but also as a specific kind of experience. This interest is also reflected in the use of a series of formal elements such as fragments and lines that work with both the viewer's visual memory, and with his psychology, creating a constant tension, which is caused by efforts to decipher these characters. In the works from recent years we can find the principle of gradual serial exploring the possibilities and limits of a rather narrowly defined repertoire of motifs, such as a repetitive composition scheme, or a similar way of working with painter’s gesture. At the same time this process is also part of a deeper awareness of their unmistakable characteristics and potential.

If we should describe Tomáš Absolon’s work in a certain context, we could include it into a broader discourse of referring to the specific conditions of the medium and its history. The basic set of elements, that the paintings work with, is partly based on an extensive fund of abstract painting. We could also mention the trends in contemporary art and reflect certain ideas taken out of the object-oriented ontology and theoretical thinking about the nature and functioning of various visual strategies of product design. Principles derived from these two areas and derived meanings are the first visible platform where there's a majority of their interpenetration, concurrence and contradictions with which the author works.

A particular importance in Absolon’s work occupies a specific opposite system of compositions, based on which there are, side by side, designed elements of a more technical nature in contact with colored valeurs, atmospheric effects and other impressions, which we could put in the category of symbols that represent a rather sensual and spiritual sphere, or are also often perceived as an expression of the artist's inner emotions. At the same time they are also known symbols and strategies that have found wider use across the whole spectrum of cultural production and therefore there is perhaps nothing else to do than to refer to them with appropriate distance and irony. And so the name of this exhibition could actually be a really successful slogan.

Martin Nytra

Go back