TOMÁŠ ABSOLON / MONET ON MY MIND

The most remarkable, for some perhaps somewhat old-fashioned but at the same time unusually topical aspect of Lenka Vítková's work is its emblematic nature. However, not in the art-history sense of the word when an image is directly linked with a text in a single sign unit which contains a gnomic title, allegorical representation and an epigram revealing the meaning of the enigmatic title and the even more enigmatic representation. In her case, the emblem is more appropriately understood as a metaphor for a variety of rather personal tactics and artistic strategies in uncovering meaning by obscuring it, and a multifaceted manifestation of the unity of poetry and image.

It is therefore not a literary extension of a work of art, or, conversely, of the imagery of texts but, first and foremost, a condensation of lived experience that allows the artist to perform meaning through a multi-directional exchange between the seen, the thought and the written, an exchange conducted through words, a spatial intervention, sound or moving image, a painterly gesture or the selection and processing of a specific material - in recent years, for example, plaster, which is not just the basis for painting etudes but also comes into play as a visually and haptically active thing-sign. The title of Lenka Vítková's current exhibition and the accompanying publication, First Book of Emblems, is therefore an explicit acknowledgement of the principle of her creative practice, as well as the artist’s suggestion of how the viewer (and the reader) could approach them.

Waving, circling, approaching and receding, leaning, walking, falling. Transformation. A meaning created by the movement of words and the action of the painted surface, by an image related to a sentence. A meaning emerging from the image following a sentence, from a sound or film sequence as a transposition of a word or image. Lenka Vítková's approach to her work is typified by a special kind of civility and ability to speak for herself in relation to the emerging whole of the world through subjects whose prospective banality is cancelled not only by the mentioned emblematic nature but in recent years predominantly by working on the painting, painting as a still-effective way of showing what I mean. Clues which are obviously distilled starting points include not only signs, abstract patterns and abstracted realities or objects and configurations of the seen - glimpsed, but also objects, body fragments and figures. Yet it is always about the whole. Indeed, the subtle objectivity of the subject with which Lenka Vítková is currently working is accompanied at every step by her ability to share much broader contexts, more like a condition than an explanation of the present ones, which make the choice even more significant. Or, last but not least, there is that unsentimental way in which the artist, through painterly means, lays out and activates the surface in order to keep in play the affective qualities of the creative process and their sources.

If Lenka Vítková's works and exhibitions sometimes make the sympathetic viewer feel slightly dizzy, it is due to the continuous stream of exchange between seeing and intellectual work. Her art (she is an exceptional colourist among painters of her generation and beyond) amplifies and intensifies the feeling of the viewer's physical presence in front of the painting or in its space, while at the same time giving meaning to the actual experience that the recipient is undergoing in a difficult-to-convey state of consciousness. One aspect of this type of artistic experience (emphasized by the tradition of modernism) is the result of long-standing exercises through which we still, albeit rarely, and then with a certain suspicion that we are definitely missing something, master the dialectical relationship in which the self and the universe, immediacy and mediation, subjectivity and impersonality, or tradition and its unique fulfilment, can be found. Although we can speculate about what the postmodern emancipation of the sign universe has made possible for the artist and which line of modernist subjective universalism she may be following, the artist herself has described her art practice most accurately: “I’m coming,/ don't know what I’m bringing./ I’ll start somewhere,/ I’ll do something somehow./ Some things the material will do on its own. The gestures I own.”

Text: Marek Pokorný

The project was financially supported by the City of Brno and Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic.

TOMÁŠ ABSOLON / MONET ON MY MIND

10.12.2014 - 16.01.2015

Fait Gallery Preview
Dominican Square 10, Brno
10/12/2014 – 16/1/2015
Opening: 9/12/2014 at 6pm
Curator: Martin Nytra

The main point of interest for Tomáš Absolon is a painting, which, in his concept, can be understood as an interface between depiction and abstraction. However, rather than this subtle line, the author devotes much more attention to work with visual shortcuts and means of painting, including the expression and gesture.

Absolon focuses on the relationship of the painting and reality, which the painting reproduces and also co-creates, and therefore Absolon understands it as a communication tool that uses its own language, but also as a specific kind of experience. This interest is also reflected in the use of a series of formal elements such as fragments and lines that work with both the viewer's visual memory, and with his psychology, creating a constant tension, which is caused by efforts to decipher these characters. In the works from recent years we can find the principle of gradual serial exploring the possibilities and limits of a rather narrowly defined repertoire of motifs, such as a repetitive composition scheme, or a similar way of working with painter’s gesture. At the same time this process is also part of a deeper awareness of their unmistakable characteristics and potential.

If we should describe Tomáš Absolon’s work in a certain context, we could include it into a broader discourse of referring to the specific conditions of the medium and its history. The basic set of elements, that the paintings work with, is partly based on an extensive fund of abstract painting. We could also mention the trends in contemporary art and reflect certain ideas taken out of the object-oriented ontology and theoretical thinking about the nature and functioning of various visual strategies of product design. Principles derived from these two areas and derived meanings are the first visible platform where there's a majority of their interpenetration, concurrence and contradictions with which the author works.

A particular importance in Absolon’s work occupies a specific opposite system of compositions, based on which there are, side by side, designed elements of a more technical nature in contact with colored valeurs, atmospheric effects and other impressions, which we could put in the category of symbols that represent a rather sensual and spiritual sphere, or are also often perceived as an expression of the artist's inner emotions. At the same time they are also known symbols and strategies that have found wider use across the whole spectrum of cultural production and therefore there is perhaps nothing else to do than to refer to them with appropriate distance and irony. And so the name of this exhibition could actually be a really successful slogan.

Martin Nytra

Go back